政治反对运动与遵纪守法

2023年4月17日

三不运动在达摩上有一定的活跃度，刚看到一个贴，告诫达摩新用户要守法而且对于政治上的偏激言论要躲远一点，不要转发或评论。就此，“陆肆黑衫”网友立即给了一个回复，是用中英文书写的，现在转发如下（英文的在最后）：

分享一个截图，是一个人在达摩上发的上网指导书里的一段话，我突然感觉遇到了一个共产主义接班人。当然，这是一个玩笑，但是作为正式的建议，居然是告诉读者要遵纪守法，对偏激的政治言论绕着走，不要作反应。这或许是许多人的想法，因为没有人希望自己遭到政府的打压。然而，有没有人意识到政治观点的表达是基本的人权？这个人权叫作”言论自由“？有没有人意识到当你不被政府代表的时候，当你未授权给这个政府的时候，你有权收回你的权力？当他们不代表你的时候，换句话说，当他们政府中的任何代表都不代表你的时候，他们的权力就是你的，他们非法抢夺了你的权力。这是世界人权宣言的精神，也是美国之所以独立的根本原因。
当年的美国人宣布独立的时候，他们在那之前的一刻都还是英国人，所以他们犯了叛国罪，但是，正义最终站到了他们一边。如果每个人都觉得必须遵纪守法的话，那么，世界到今天也不会有一个美国。
如果说，你害怕违法，没有关系，然而，需得着像躲瘟疫一样地对待政治反对运动吗？你可以绕着走，三不运动在政府眼里的确是违法和犯罪，不过，三不运动有承诺绝不会透露任何人的信息，因此，政府不会得知谁参与了政治反对运动。同时，这一运动的诉求是教育系统的变革，是为了后代能够摆脱被洗脑和作为家长摆脱被盘剥的命运，这本身不仅不是”激进“，而且是政治学的教育（当然不是马列主义政治），该学科-非暴力冲突，由牛津大学毕业的吉恩夏普博士创立，现在是哈佛大学教授领导研究方向。其中一个最重要的原理就是通过非暴力的方式去打击政府的权力部门，这不是什么违法犯罪，这是人权，用哈佛大学教授的话，这是“人民力量”、”人民权力“。难道真正犯罪的是谁，你还不清楚吗？如果你不清楚，你肯定不会上这里来。
再次说明一下：世界人权宣言和国际人权法都确认言论自由是每个人生来具有的，并且政治反对，无论是抗议还是集体抵制，都是国际人权法确认合法的。

英文（English）

I’d like to share a snapshot, which was part of a instruction note to new users on Nostr community, and reminds me at once of a successor of a communist cause.  Well, just a joke.  Yet, as a quite formal guidance to new comers, the advice was outright a resounding no violation of laws nor any touch with politically radical notes in the community, by giving no response as if they were not there at all.  This might be a typical thought of many, because nobody wishes to be persecuted by their government.
Nevertheless, has anyone realized that expression of political views is a human right, which is called “freedom of speech”?  Has anyone realized that when you are not at all represented by your government, when you have not consented to this government, you have the right to take back your power?  When they don’t represent you, in other words, not a single representative in the government represents you, their power is in fact yours.  They illegitimately snatched power from you.  This is what the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms as well as the aspiration of the Independence of America.
The moment before the Americans declared their independence, they had been British, who had all committed treason to the Great Britain, yet eventually righteousness stood on their side.  If everyone felt obliged to abide by the law, there wouldn’t be a USA today.
If you say you are afraid, that’s not a problem, yet, is it really necessary to avert a politically opposition campaign as if it were a plague?  You may well choose to stay away from it, 3 Nos Campaign is right a violation of law and a crime, however, 3 nos campaign is committed to no disclosure of anyone’s information so that the government won’t know who have participated in the political opposition campaign.  Meantime, this campaign seeks to change the current education system for the forthcoming generations not to be subject to brainwashing, and for the parents not to be ripped off for children's schooling.  This is not only non-radical, but from the teachings of political science.  The subject of concern, nonviolent conflict, was founded by Gene Sharp, a PhD from Oxford University and is now led by a Harvard professor.  In this subject, the most important principle is to leverage nonviolent campaigns to attack the pillars of supports for the government.  This is not at all violation of laws or a crime, but a human right.  In the word of Harvard professor, this is the “People Power”.  Can’t people really identify who are the real criminals?  Don’t you know?  If not, you would not be present here in this community.
To put it again: both the Universal  Declaration of Human Rights and International Human Rights Laws have affirmed that freedom of speech is an inborn and un-alienated right that everyone enjoys since their birth, and political oppositions, no matter in the form of protest or boycott, are all legitimate by International Human Rights Law.